Comments on: If Obama Is So Concerned That Our Constitution Is Protected By Trying To Prosecute Interrogators Then Why?

By: Charles Veidt

Charles Veidt — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:32:53 +0000

Yawn.

By: Matthew D

Matthew D — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:51:12 +0000

No.

By: TEH TYME KITTEH ~pantheist~

TEH TYME KITTEH ~pantheist~ — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:14:32 +0000

We are wasting our time here with them, when we should be mobilizing and practicing for our final assault

By: brown950

brown950 — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:21:30 +0000

Czar = staff.
Every President has had them.

By: Hater Police

Hater Police — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:20:21 +0000

Having CIA agents break US law while interrogating suspects does little to support our constitution.

By: Senor Magoo

Senor Magoo — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:26:40 +0000

czar = underling of dictator president.

By: Independant Beachbum

Independant Beachbum — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:07:34 +0000

If the Bush administration and the CIA hired outside contractors then yes these people should be prosecuted

By: Mike F

Mike F — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:24:58 +0000

The ACLU is the organization looking into the matter, not the President.

By: 2salty4u

2salty4u — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:45:20 +0000

Sure , prior prezs have had czars , but never before in the history of this country has there been more than three dozen ! Now we find that the czars are pre-screened by the known Communist Van Jones.

By: Edvado

Edvado — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:44:49 +0000

You want to grind that one down to one or two questions and re-post?
Maybe without the BLATANT sarcasm?