Comments on: Was Obama A Success Or Failure In Copenhagen?

By: Not Einstein Yet

Not Einstein Yet — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:51:31 +0000

well it is better than nothing

By: Raina

Raina — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:10:42 +0000

failure — but he has to hurry home because of a snow storm

By: continually amazed

continually amazed — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:02:16 +0000

He looks like someone who tried unlike the destroyer Connies.

By: Christine K

Christine K — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:35:26 +0000

Big failure but he touts as a success.

By: Live to Fish

Live to Fish — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:03:04 +0000

He succeeded in failing which is one of his specialties.

By: prusa123

prusa123 — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:54:47 +0000

Obama was a failure, is a failure and will be a failure.

By: Patient Sailor

Patient Sailor — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:56:48 +0000

Like the idiot he is. The Indian’s and Chinese won’t give him the chance to grandstand in Mexico City like he did in Copenhagen. He got a promise to get some to make a “list”. Nothing more. Only an complete moron would describe this as an “unprecedented” moment in US foreign policy.
George Will:
It would have been unprecedented had the president not described the outcome of the Copenhagen climate change summit as “unprecedented,” that being the most overworked word in his hardworking vocabulary of self-celebration. Actually, the mountain beneath the summit — a mountain of manufactured hysteria, predictable cupidity, antic demagoguery and dubious science — labored mightily and gave birth to a mouselet, a 12-paragraph document committing the signatories to … make a list.
A list of the goals they have no serious intention of trying to meet. The document even dropped the words “as soon as possible” from its call for a binding agreement on emissions.