USA President 2009

I believe his decision to use the strapping bald headed thugs from his unions is going to cause major problems. The children and grand children of many of the old people are very angry and are going to start showing up to deal with the punks trying to intimidate their loved ones.
Who among you Liberals and Communists have advised Obama and his Communist henchmen in the WH that most of these old folks show up at the meetings on crutches and walkers only with the intent of protecting their health care programs?

I do know of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s failed attempt in Clinton’s first term. Have there been other attempts before that?

I have been hearing about it briefly but still do not understand what President Obama wants to do. Republicans this and Democrats that, and the Senate and Clinton….all words but what is the real deal here? How are insurance companies going to be affected and why are the consumers going to gain?

Under Obama’s upcoming National Health Care Plan the government will dictate what doctor you will have, and what treatments you will be allowed to have (depending upon your age). Currently, only politicians will have their own (superior) health care plan. Should this be allowed? Or should politicians have to participate in the same plan as the common people?

Could it be that the malpractice lawyers are lining his pockets?
Many doctors are paying in excess of $100,000 a year for malpractice not because they are bad doctors, but because pain and suffering settlements are outrageously high. Do away with pain and suffering suits and you could probably insure everyone at a reasonable rate.

Why do we need President Obama’s big-bang health-care reform at all? What’s the real agenda here? If it’s really to cover the truly uninsured, a much cheaper, targeted, small-ball approach would do the trick.
But on the other hand, maybe the real goal is a larger, ultra-liberal plan aimed at a government takeover of the U.S. health system.
In a recent column, Larry Elder points to an ABC News/USA Today/Kaiser Family Foundation survey that shows 89 percent of Americans are satisfied with their health care. That means up to 250 million people could be happy with their plans. So why is it that we need Obama’s big-bang health-care overhaul in the first place?
In a new Pew Research Center poll, only 41 percent of those surveyed believe the U.S. health-care system needs to be completely rebuilt.
In early 1993, when Mr. and Mrs. Clinton started on health-care reform, 55 percent said the system needs a complete overhaul. So something has changed.
In a new CBS/New York Times poll, 38 percent says the economy is the most important problem facing the country, 19 percent says jobs, and only 7 percent says health care. In an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll on the same question, 24 percent says the budget deficit is today’s most worrisome problem, while only 11 percent says health care. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c…

Why do we need President Obama’s big-bang health-care reform at all? What’s the real agenda here? If it’s really to cover the truly uninsured, a much cheaper, targeted, small-ball approach would do the trick.
But on the other hand, maybe the real goal is a larger, ultra-liberal plan aimed at a government takeover of the U.S. health system.
In a recent column, Larry Elder points to an ABC News/USA Today/Kaiser Family Foundation survey that shows 89 percent of Americans are satisfied with their health care. That means up to 250 million people could be happy with their plans. So why is it that we need Obama’s big-bang health-care overhaul in the first place?
In a new Pew Research Center poll, only 41 percent of those surveyed believe the U.S. health-care system needs to be completely rebuilt.
In early 1993, when Mr. and Mrs. Clinton started on health-care reform, 55 percent said the system needs a complete overhaul. So something has changed.
In a new CBS/New York Times poll, 38 percent says the economy is the most important problem facing the country, 19 percent says jobs, and only 7 percent says health care. In an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll on the same question, 24 percent says the budget deficit is today’s most worrisome problem, while only 11 percent says health care. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c…

Why do we need President Obama’s big-bang health-care reform at all? What’s the real agenda here? If it’s really to cover the truly uninsured, a much cheaper, targeted, small-ball approach would do the trick.
But on the other hand, maybe the real goal is a larger, ultra-liberal plan aimed at a government takeover of the U.S. health system.
In a recent column, Larry Elder points to an ABC News/USA Today/Kaiser Family Foundation survey that shows 89 percent of Americans are satisfied with their health care. That means up to 250 million people could be happy with their plans. So why is it that we need Obama’s big-bang health-care overhaul in the first place?
In a new Pew Research Center poll, only 41 percent of those surveyed believe the U.S. health-care system needs to be completely rebuilt.
In early 1993, when Mr. and Mrs. Clinton started on health-care reform, 55 percent said the system needs a complete overhaul. So something has changed.
In a new CBS/New York Times poll, 38 percent says the economy is the most important problem facing the country, 19 percent says jobs, and only 7 percent says health care. In an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll on the same question, 24 percent says the budget deficit is today’s most worrisome problem, while only 11 percent says health care. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c…